I'm dealing with a caching issue where I need data pulled from a CMS to reflect on the page. It doesn't need to be in real time, I just don't want static routes. From the the docs, it sounds like cache: no-store doesn't affect the full route cache while revalidate: 0 will. However, the docs mention that opting out of full route cache is, "in other words, dynamically render components".

Then in another part of the docs, it mentions that any uncached data request will cause a route to be dynamically rendered (which means that any uncached data request affects the full route cache???). So does this mean the two cache options are equivalent? Sorry if this is all over the place, I am just confused at what I should be using or if it is a non-issue.