Question about layouts
Answered
Youssef posted this in #help-forum
YoussefOP
I have a misunderstanding regarding multiple layouts in Next.
Let's say I have two architectures:
First architecture:
Second architecture:
In the
But when I switch to the
Could someone explain what the difference is and what happened?
Thanks in advance.
Let's say I have two architectures:
First architecture:
app
├── sign-in
│ ├── page.tsx
│ └── layout.tsx
├── page.tsx
└── layout.tsxSecond architecture:
app
├── sign-in
│ ├── page.tsx
│ └── layout.tsx
└── (root)
├── page.tsx
└── layout.tsxIn the
First architecture, when I navigate from / to /sign-in (or vice versa), I get this error:Error: Clerk: You've added multiple <ClerkProvider> components in your React component tree. Wrap your components in a single <ClerkProvider>.But when I switch to the
Second architecture, I get no error and it works perfectly.Could someone explain what the difference is and what happened?
Thanks in advance.
Answered by Rafael Almeida
in the first architecture you have a root layout (
you can already notice what is the issue, the provider is already defined in the root layout so there is no need to define it again in the
in the second architecture you have multiple root layouts, so
app/layout.tsx) so all segments are gonna be built on top of it. this means that app/sign-in/layout.tsx will be nested inside it:<AppLayout>
<SignInLayout>
<SignInPage />
</SignInLayout>
</AppLayout>you can already notice what is the issue, the provider is already defined in the root layout so there is no need to define it again in the
sign-in layoutin the second architecture you have multiple root layouts, so
app/sign-in-layout.tsx isn't nested by app/(root)/layout.tsx because they don't have any nesting relation in the folders:// Route: /sign-in
<SignInLayout>
<SignInPage />
</SignInLayout>
// Route: /
<RootLayout>
<HomePage />
</RootLayout>2 Replies
in the first architecture you have a root layout (
you can already notice what is the issue, the provider is already defined in the root layout so there is no need to define it again in the
in the second architecture you have multiple root layouts, so
app/layout.tsx) so all segments are gonna be built on top of it. this means that app/sign-in/layout.tsx will be nested inside it:<AppLayout>
<SignInLayout>
<SignInPage />
</SignInLayout>
</AppLayout>you can already notice what is the issue, the provider is already defined in the root layout so there is no need to define it again in the
sign-in layoutin the second architecture you have multiple root layouts, so
app/sign-in-layout.tsx isn't nested by app/(root)/layout.tsx because they don't have any nesting relation in the folders:// Route: /sign-in
<SignInLayout>
<SignInPage />
</SignInLayout>
// Route: /
<RootLayout>
<HomePage />
</RootLayout>Answer
@Rafael Almeida in the first architecture you have a root layout (`app/layout.tsx`) so all segments are gonna be built on top of it. this means that `app/sign-in/layout.tsx` will be nested inside it:
js
<AppLayout>
<SignInLayout>
<SignInPage />
</SignInLayout>
</AppLayout>
you can already notice what is the issue, the provider is already defined in the root layout so there is no need to define it again in the `sign-in` layout
in the second architecture you have multiple root layouts, so `app/sign-in-layout.tsx` isn't nested by `app/(root)/layout.tsx` because they don't have any nesting relation in the folders:
js
// Route: /sign-in
<SignInLayout>
<SignInPage />
</SignInLayout>
// Route: /
<RootLayout>
<HomePage />
</RootLayout>
YoussefOP
OK I got it
Thanks!
Thanks!